« Massage Message | Main | Widening Inequality» Russell Roberts
September 05, 2004
Nobel Economists in the WSJ
Don Boudreaux
The September 3rd edition of The Wall Street Journal has an article that reports the answers of several Nobel economists to a variety of questions. It's an interesting read (paid subscription required).
One question was "In what sphere of life, if any, do you think it most important to limit the influence of market forces?"
A sample of answers includes Milton Friedman's cryptic reply "Self-ownership of human beings" (by which I assume he means that people ought not be permitted to sell or to gift themselves into slavery).
Lawrence Klein argues that market failures and corruption are responsible for what he calls the "skewness of the income and wealth distributions both within and among national economies."
William Sharpe: "Extreme concentration of economic and political power."
Joseph Stiglitz: "Economists' usual list begins with distribution of income. There is no reason to believe that the distribution of income that emerges out of market processes is desirable or acceptable. Unbridled market forces without any role of government might lead to a large number of people living under subsistence. This is an area for government to do something. We know that unbridled economic forces can lead to big booms and big recessions. We need to do something about that. We know that a market can lead to pollution -- and there's an important role for government there. We know that there will be under-investment in public goods. As we think about the innovation economy, we should remember that most of the innovation in the private sector is based on research financed by the government, such as its role in developing the Internet."
[Footnote from Boudreaux: What evidence does Stiglitz rely upon for his conclusion that "most of the innovation in the private sector is based on research financed by the government"?]
Robert Solow: "In the advanced economies, I would say: To avoid mass unemployment, poverty and widening inequality."
Note the concern with income distribution.
But note now my colleague Vernon Smith's splendid answer: "None, because 'markets' are about recognizing that information is dispersed in all social systems, and that the problem of society is to find, devise and discover institutions that incentivize and enable people to make the right decisions without anyone having to tell them what to do. The idea that market forces should be limited stems from a fundamental error in beliefs about markets. This is the wrong question."
Vernon is also the only Nobel economist who answered the question "Who was the most important economist of the 20th century besides you" with -- "Hayek."
Posted by Don Boudreaux in Current Affairs | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834518ccc69e200d834570f2969e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Nobel Economists in the WSJ:
» The Market of Corporate Force from Law, Legislation, and Lunacy
Why the market isn't appropriate everywhere. [Read More]
Tracked on Sep 5, 2004 9:44:13 PM
» Wednesday's Daily News from The Club for Growth Blog
Relevant News and Commentary Nobel Economists in the WSJ - D. Boudreaux, Cafe Hayek Let’s Talk Taxes - G. Hubbard, AEI Masters of Political Deception - T. Bothwell, ESR Income Inequality - W. Williams, Townhall.com A Labor Day Report Card... [Read More]
Tracked on Sep 8, 2004 9:49:55 AM
» WSJ and Nobel Economists from Division of Labour
The WSJ recently asked some Nobel Prize winners about current events and for their predictions for the future. Selected responses were printed in Friday's WSJ; the full responses are on wsj.com. (A paid subscription is required but both Russ Roberts... [Read More]
Tracked on Sep 8, 2004 4:01:13 PM
» loan personal
from loan mortgage
Loans Home Equity Loans - Home Mortgage Student Loans [Read More]
Tracked on Jun 18, 2006 3:15:14 PM
