« Discount Analysis | Main | A New Year's Bouquet of Blessings» Don Boudreaux
December 31, 2004
The Wages of Wal-Mart
Don Boudreaux
Yesterday I wrote about Liza Featherstone’s recent attempted exposé of Wal-Mart.
One of Featherstone’s claims that I didn’t deal with there is her allegation that Wal-Mart free-rides on government welfare payments. Her argument (which, I recall, is not unique to her) is that welfare payments enable Wal-Mart to pay lower wages. The allegation, in other words, is that taxpayer-funded welfare increases the supply of workers. (For those of you who know basic economics, the supply-of-labor curve shifts to the right, lowering the equilibrium wage and increasing the number of workers hired.)
Almost anything is possible. The condition under which Featherstone’s hypothesis is most likely to be true is that many people in Wal-Mart’s pool of potential workers must be so desperately poor that working in the absence of welfare payments would yield them too little income to be worthwhile. Because no income at all likely means starvation, the wages that Wal-Mart allegedly would pay even in the absence of government welfare payments would be so low that potential workers simply wouldn’t find it worthwhile to take jobs; they’d stay home and starve because the wages they’d earn by working at Wal-Mart would be too low to keep them alive. Government welfare payments, by helping to keep these workers alive (hence, in the labor market) enable these workers to accept Wal-Mart’s low wages.
The argument, then, is not so much that government welfare payments increase the supply of labor as that these payments create Wal-Mart’s supply of labor.
Featherstone probably would deny that she has the above in mind. (I try not to be mean or accusatory, but I must say that it’s damnably difficult to figure out what Featherstone has in mind. She hurls assertions rather than offers analyses. She flings about mere anecdotes – which in many cases only doubtfully support her assertions – without furnishing a single set of organized facts.) She likely supposes that without welfare payments, workers would "need" – and, hence, demand and get paid from Wal-Mart – higher wages. That is, she likely believes that the supply of workers available to Wal-Mart would be lower, but still positive, in the absence of welfare payments.
This proposition is even more dubious. If workers bid their wages up to (say) $10 per hour without welfare payments, two things must be true. First, these workers must generate at least that much marginal revenue for Wal-Mart – that is, these workers must be sufficiently productive that they are each worth at least $10 per hour to Wal-Mart – otherwise greedy, profit-obsessed Wal-Mart would not pay them this much. Second, other employers must be in competition with Wal-Mart for these workers. Without sufficient competition for these workers, Wal-Mart could indeed hire many of them at wages below the level of the (marginal) value of their contribution to Wal-Mart’s bottom line.
So, if Wal-Mart pays its workers $10 per hour, we can be sure that (1) these workers produce value for Wal-Mart at least equal to $10 per hour, and (2) other employers compete with Wal-Mart with sufficient intensity to drive these wages up to $10 per hour. (The validity of this latter proposition is enhanced by the fact that Wal-Mart’s U.S. work force isn’t unionized.)
What is it about receiving welfare that reduces this ability to earn $10 per hour? Do welfare payments reduce workers’ productivity? Unlikely – but if so, then, yes, wages paid by Wal-Mart will fall, but so too will the value that Wal-Mart gets from its workers. Wal-Mart doesn’t gain by any such effect.
Do welfare payments reduce the competition of other employers for workers? Not likely.
Do welfare payments reduce the eagerness of employees to earn as much per hour as possible? Again, unlikely – but I suppose that Featherstone has something like this effect in mind. Insofar as welfare payments reduce the amount of wages that workers "need," Featherstone likely would explain, they are willing to work for less than they would accept in the absence of welfare payments. So even if competing employers would still offer, say, $9.90 per hour to attract away Wal-Mart employees, the representative Wal-Mart employee would reason "Heck, I get $X from the government, so I don’t need this princely wage. I’ll reject the competing offer and let Wal-Mart cut my wage to (say) $8.00."
Seems highly dubious.
Indeed, insofar as welfare payments reduce workers' willingness to work, government welfare payments reduce the supply of labor and, thus, raise the wage that Wal-Mart (and other employers) must pay for workers.
Posted by Don Boudreaux in Myths and Fallacies | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834518ccc69e200d834224b1553ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Wages of Wal-Mart:
» Friday's Daily News from The Club for Growth Blog
The “Stinginess” Of U.S. Aid - DanielDrezner.com Are We Stingy? - Bruce Bartlett, Townhall.com Unexpected Tsunami Heroes: Bloggers - Human Events Corporations Donate Millions, Supplies - NewsMax.com Dying To Pay Taxes - Adam Smith Blog Taxp... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 31, 2004 10:28:08 AM
» Don Boudreaux on Wages from Always Low Prices -- Always.
Now Don attacks Ms. Featherstone's lack of economic logic:One of Featherstone’s claims that I didn’t deal with there is her allegation that Wal-Mart free-rides on government welfare payments. Her argument (which, I recall, is not unique to her) is that... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 31, 2004 10:55:01 AM
» Another shot at Wal-Mart misses the mark from No Illusions
The Nation devoted this issue's cover story to a critique of Wal-Mart. Since the piece attempts some economic arguments, they really should have gotten someone who understands economics to write it. Don Boudreaux discusses the major fallacies ... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 31, 2004 9:25:38 PM
» The Wages of Wal-Mart from kevin rose dot com
Link: Cafe Hayek: The Wages of Wal-Mart. [Read More]
Tracked on Jan 2, 2005 2:43:25 PM
» Does Wal-Mart's Employment Practices Impose Costs on Taxpayers? from The Liberal Order
As I noted below, the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) has been relentless on its attacks of non-union grocery chains. Wal-Mart has been its biggest target and they have received support from various labor sympathizers. The latest attacks [Read More]
Tracked on Jan 5, 2005 12:06:58 PM
» Does Wal-Mart's Employment Practices Impose Costs on Society? from The Liberal Order
As I noted below, the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) has been relentless on its attacks of non-union grocery chains. Wal-Mart has been its biggest target and they have received support from various labor sympathizers. The latest attacks [Read More]
Tracked on Jan 5, 2005 12:08:59 PM
» Full Albums Archive from MP3 Album Finder
Enter Artist or Song or Album name to search: ... Download VA - –усска€ коллекци€ 4 «олотой шл€гер 70 х (1973 1979) mp3 ... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 5, 2006 3:13:54 PM
» MP3 Downloads, Full Albums, Latest Hits, MP3 Search from Global Media Search Engine
Big Mp3 Archive, Mp3 Search, Mp3 Albums, Mp3 Songs, Mp3 Software, Mp3 Traffic Exchange, Advertising... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 5, 2006 3:32:57 PM
» Finance Search Online: day insurance from Business Finance Online
Business Finance Online Product/Service Directory. Search for business finance related products and services by browsing the directory of business finance ... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 28, 2006 10:19:00 AM
» Europages, European directory from Open Directory Project
Multilingual european business directory, 600000 european companies, european company directory and business opportunities, trade leads, ... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 29, 2006 1:29:45 AM
» SmartPhone Today: Orange SPV Classic from Smartphone Reviews; Best SmartPhones
The Internet's 3rd Party information center for SmartPhone Shareware, SmartPhone Freeware, Reviews, Hardware, Discussion, and more! Updated Daily... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 30, 2006 12:27:35 PM
» College Opportunities Online Locator from Search the Web
Search by criteria. Search by location, program, or both. By Location - Select up to 12 States or a Geographic Region ... [Read More]
Tracked on May 20, 2006 5:35:00 PM
