« Cato's Tanner on Health Care | Main | Our 'Most Important Right'?» Don Boudreaux
October 04, 2005
An Open Letter to My Libertarian Friends Who Don’t Understand My Opposition to the War in Iraq
Don Boudreaux
Dear Friends:
The issue today on which libertarians are most divided is the war in Iraq. I am decidedly in the anti-Iraq-war camp; others – many of whom are people whose opinions and judgment I respect enormously – are in the pro-Iraq-war camp. Quite a few of these friends take issue with me for opposing the war. "Don’t you understand," they ask, "the unseen costs of not going to war? Didn’t Chamberlain’s appeasement of Hitler teach you anything?"
I’m well aware that failure to take action when it should be taken can cause ill consequences just as much as can taking action when action should not be taken. I am also aware that being weak and irresolute invites bullying. Nevertheless, the truth of these general principles is insufficient to justify this war.
Before I spell out my reasons for believing the war in Iraq to be unjustified, I emphasize that I am no pacifist. That is, I don’t believe that love (or negotiation) can conquer all; I don’t believe that violence used in self-defense is inappropriate; I don’t believe that proclaiming a commitment to peace is sufficient to prevent others from aggressing against you; and I do not believe that the fist used by Saddam Hussein to crush the Iraqi people was anything other than iron. Hussein is a beast who deserves no mercy.
Still, the war in Iraq is unjustified. By this I mean that the justifications offered for the war by the Bush administration have proven to be mistaken or empty. Most obviously, Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction. Nor is there any credible evidence that the 9/11 attackers were in any material way aided by Saddam Hussein. And while it’s true that Hussein was an evil tyrant, this fact is neither among the chief reasons first offered by the administration for going to war in Iraq, nor is it a sufficient reason for going to war.
The world is full of evil tyrants. But given the nature of government, it’s not the role of government A to sit in judgment of government B. The most legitimate role for any government is to protect its own people from violence. Whenever Uncle Sam unleashes his mighty military in foreign countries for the purpose of protecting foreign citizens from their own governments, he weakens his ability to protect Americans.
This weakening takes place on three fronts. One is that troops, munitions, and other resources are diverted away from the task of protecting Americans. Even a country as wealthy as the United States does not have unlimited resources to devote to military excursions.
The second (and I think more serious) reason that such interventions imperil Americans is that no one – often including the intended beneficiaries of our intervention – likes a powerful entity unilaterally throwing its weight around. The reasons for resenting even well-intentioned foreign interventions by powerful militaries are complex, likely involving a suspicion that the intervening military really has a hidden motive, or that despite its good intentions, a foreign power has too little understanding of the nuances of the situation to do anything beyond kill today’s bad guys.
Who among us trusts a powerful and heavily armed foreign behemoth – an alien giant capable of killing millions in short order – merely because the behemoth assures us that it means well? Who among us would not be inspired to do all that we can to terrorize that behemoth if we feared (accurately or not) that it really intends to harm our homeland and loved ones?
The third and related way in which even ‘benevolent’ foreign interventions put Americans in deeper peril is that our interventions are too likely to backfire. Even if everyone from the President down to the junior janitor at Lockheed Martin intends only to help foreigners escape the grips of their home-grown tyrants, political and cultural situations are always more complex than politicians imagine them to be. Why was Saddam Hussein ruling Iraq? Were Iraqis just incredibly unlucky that such a vile dictator somehow grabbed power and ruled ruthlessly for so long? Or was Hussein’s tyranny at least as much a consequence as a cause of a dysfunctional cultural, political, and economic situation? If so, then removing the dictator does not remove the complex underlying causes that fueled his tyranny.
Removing a dictator is child’s play for a military as awesome as that of the United States. So Hussein is now history. But because the underlying causes that put him in power to begin with are still in place in Iraq, that country likely will soon revert to another dictator – one different in name and different in style, but a brute nevertheless. He will oppress, kill, and impoverish. (The notion that a poweful military can uproot dysfunctional cultural, political, and economic root causes of tyranny strikes me as naive in the extreme. Just as your local policeman can protect Ms. Jones from her husband's physical abuse but can't hope to counsel their marriage into a happy one, so, too can a military remove a tyrannt like Hussein but can't hope to cure that society of what really ails it.)
And Americans will be blamed for this tragedy. The fact that our President meant well will matter little to people tyrannized by the government that replaced the one we abolished. Americans will be hated more intensely, and suffer greater danger of terrorist attacks.
Of course, the Bush administration insists that removing Hussein from power was done not just to help ordinary Iraqis but also to help protect Americans – that this war is in America’s self-interest.
Perhaps. Those of us not privy to the intelligence that the President receives cannot say for certain that, in early 2003, it was unreasonable to suppose that Hussein posed a serious-enough threat to Americans to justify a military invasion. The fact that weapons of mass destruction were not found in Iraq doesn’t prove that the risk that was then perceived wasn’t high enough to justify the invasion.
But surely in matters of war we must hold leaders to a super-high standard of accuracy. Because military intelligence is secret (meaning that ordinary people have no knowledge of its details), it's simply too easy for politicians to lie about it or to misrepresent it -- to use it for political purposes. This reason alone counsels that we insist that those who exercise power in a free society be especially cautious before launching military invasions.
But when combined with the fact that even many people who distrust the government to deliver mail and regulate factory safety lose their reservations of that same government when it is off on military adventures, the case for heightened skepticism of military adventures grows even stronger.
Why should we believe George Bush that Saddam Hussein’s regime posed a significant threat to Americans? Because he says so? He also says that ‘price-gougers’ are a real villains who should be punished. Why should we believe him when he assures us that U.S. troops and guns will eventually bring freedom and prosperity to Iraq? Because he says so? He also said that steel tariffs will help the American economy.
What reason is there – beyond the mere will to trust leaders who send troops into harm’s way in foreign lands – to believe that these politicians are acting wisely and non-politically?
Without very hard evidence that American lives were at real risk of violent attack by Saddam Hussein, I cannot help but suspect that those in power in the U.S. have abused the vast trust that Americans give them in military matters. Libertarians properly don’t trust government to run our pension plans, to deliver health care, to educate our children, or to provide disaster relief. Why be so trusting of government to wage war?
Posted by Don Boudreaux in Antitrust | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834518ccc69e200d8345a964769e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference An Open Letter to My Libertarian Friends Who Don’t Understand My Opposition to the War in Iraq:
» Cafe Hayek: An Open Letter to My Libertarian Friends Who Don’t Understand My Opposition to the War in Iraq from Live from (top) Dead Center
Cafe Hayek: An Open Letter to My Libertarian Friends Who Don’t Understand My Opposition to the War in Iraq
Seems to contain a few good solid points, ending on:
Without very hard evidence that American lives were at real risk of violent attack by ... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 4, 2005 10:53:48 AM
» Lunch Links from The Agitator
Harriet Miers was hired by President Bush's gubernatorial campaign to squelch those persistent National Guard stories. More evidence that her... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 4, 2005 11:07:23 AM
» libertarian+warmongerer=oxymoron from South(west)paw
Don Boudreaux is the head of the economics department at George Mason University. Econ@GMU is even more monosexual than the average economics department (there’s one woman). It’s also monotheoretical – it’s a hotbed for libertarians, most of whom have ... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 4, 2005 1:22:46 PM
» An Open Sentence to My Libertarian Friends Who Don’t Understand My Opposition to the War in Iraq from No Treason
Don Boudreaux posts his An Open Letter to My Libertarian Friends Who Don’t Understand My Opposition to the War in Iraq. The content is predictable:
Still, the war in Iraq is unjustified. By this I mean that the justifications offered for the war b... [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 4, 2005 10:37:22 PM
» Redux Redux from The Fall of the State
Basically, I agree. [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 5, 2005 1:52:34 PM
» DISAGREEING, WITHOUT BEING DISAGREEABLE. from Cold Spring Shops
Cold Spring Shops ordinarily leaves the war coverage and commentary to others. The Superintendent recommends, however, three posts touching on different aspects of the buildup to Operation Iraqi Freedom and the aftermath. [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 9, 2005 4:50:12 PM
» MP3 Downloads, Full Albums, Latest Hits, MP3 Search from Global Media Search Engine
Big Mp3 Archive, Mp3 Search, Mp3 Albums, Mp3 Songs, Mp3 Software, Mp3 Traffic Exchange, Advertising... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 5, 2006 11:07:18 AM
» Most popular words 2006: from Reader's Favorites at Scientific American
The articles includes Editor's Favorites, top e-mailed stories, and most popular articles. ... Babies Can Learn Words as Early as 10 Months ... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 12, 2006 10:04:02 PM
» Drugs & Supplements from Drug Information and Supplement Information
Search: Enter a drug name ... LEGAL CONDITIONS AND TERMS OF USE APPLICABLE TO ALL USERS OF THIS SITE. ANY USE OF THIS SITE CONSTITUTES YOUR AGREEMENT TO ... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 13, 2006 9:42:40 PM
» Legalising and declassifying drugs from What if all drugs were legal?
urban75 drug information: a huge online resource of drug information, help and advice including cannabis, cocaine, heroin, ecstasy, solvents, ketamine and ... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 27, 2006 1:24:23 AM
» Free & Open Source Software Portal: Search from An Online Directory
Popular links · Discussion Forum. Directory Search. By Keyword. Advanced Search. Directory New Links. New links added this week. links in Portal... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 27, 2006 2:29:31 AM
» The Interactive NGC Catalog Online from Official Catalog
The Interactive NGC Catalog Online. This is the interactive NGC (and IC, and Messier) catalog at SEDS, based on the famous NGC 2000.0 by RW Sinnott of Sky ... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 30, 2006 3:06:58 AM
» Mourinho ready to rest England trio from England trio
has offered to rest his senior England trio from the last two games of [Read More]
Tracked on May 3, 2006 10:22:57 AM
» php|tek 2006 from PHP and open-source
Lerdorf, IBM's Rod Smith and Zend's Andi Gutmans, speaking on a variety of topics that [Read More]
Tracked on May 3, 2006 8:02:49 PM
» The Promise Of A B-cell Biologic Therapy For Rheumatoid Arthritis from those linked
rate of biologic therapy for RA patients, researchers have honed in on a new target: the B cell... click link for more info. [Read More]
Tracked on May 7, 2006 4:38:28 PM
» Napster Puts Up Two Million Free Songs for Streaming from music-download
service puts much of its library up for free streaming, to be supported by ad revenue. [Read More]
Tracked on May 8, 2006 3:12:26 AM
» Italian Charms from ItalianCharms -- Search results
Italian charms has stainless links from companies by Zoppini, Boxing, ReFlorence, Puzzle, Ryry, Talexia & Unodomani... [Read More]
Tracked on May 21, 2006 4:14:06 PM
» Welcome to Ukrainian Gift Shop from Gifts Shop
Ukrainian Gift Shop is the world's largest source of Pysanky, Ukrainian Easter eggs, and Pysanky supplies... [Read More]
Tracked on May 23, 2006 9:48:44 AM
» Military Said Unready for Another Katrina
(AP)
from disaster such
unless the Pentagon takes a more aggressive role in the federal response, congressional investigators said Monday. [Read More]
Tracked on May 26, 2006 12:44:20 PM
» Cambridge Dictionaries Online: pandora peaks from online dictonary
Free online dictionary from Cambridge University Press [Read More]
Tracked on May 27, 2006 9:22:31 AM
» Bvlgari from Bvlgari Watches
Great Saving On Bvlgari Watches Bulgari Watch Bvlgari Assioma, Bulgari Zero1, Bulgari Watch Tubagas, Bvlgari Diagono Aluminium, ...
[Read More]
Tracked on Aug 5, 2006 12:04:54 AM
» Hope For Morning-after Pill Without Prescription In USA from Barr Pharmaceutical,
wanted to discuss how adults may be allowed to buy 'Plan-B' over-the-counter (OTC) while [Read More]
Tracked on Aug 8, 2006 2:57:14 AM
» Search Results Page - a from ondmd
Your search results page is packed with information. ... [Read More]
Tracked on Aug 10, 2006 10:21:29 AM
» Ru-Энциклопедия from Words 2005-2006
Most Popular Words from Internet... [Read More]
Tracked on Aug 14, 2006 9:49:29 PM
