« Should Americans Worry About Foreign-Government Holdings of Dollar-Denominated Assets? | Main | What's the Relevance of Rodrik's Point?» Don Boudreaux
April 30, 2007
Black Swans
Russell Roberts
The latest EconTalk is a conversation with Nassim Nicholas Taleb about the ideas in his two books, Fooled by Randomness and The Black Swan. He is a very interesting guy. Much of what he said is well known—we have trouble absorbing and thinking about low probability events. But he says it in a way that makes me think about it in a way I hadn't before.
Posted by Russell Roberts in Podcast, Risk and Safety | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834518ccc69e200d834f971de53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Black Swans:
Comments
Good interview - he's much more palatable in person than in his books, which came off a bit heavy-handed for me.
Here's my question: why do so few talk about lognormal distributions with regard to issues like income or wealth? I believe that he (and/or mandelbrot) also implicate the power law distribution, which is similar except at the low end.
I'm not one for mathematical reductionism, but I'm not ready to throw out the practice of statistics either, just because we humans fall prone to cognitive errors.
Any of these log-based models would easily encompass high-tailed incomes, while recognizing the great preponderance of middle and lower incomes. Lognormal is commonly used in finance, for example, to represent asset prices - you can't go below zero because of bankruptcy. People are the same.
Posted by: Pasha | Apr 30, 2007 3:32:38 PM
I've only skimmed his newest book, but I like it so far. He uses Umberto Eco's large private library as an example from which he pulls the little gem that an unread book is far more valuable than the book one has already read.
Posted by: Ray G | Apr 30, 2007 9:04:40 PM
Fascinating discussion! I loved the concrete examples that the two of you discussed. But I must admit that much of the discussion was over my head. Mr. Taleb is clearly brilliant.
Posted by: Speedmaster | May 1, 2007 11:42:53 AM
Speedmaster,
Read the books. They're very accessible. Try Fooled by Randomness first. If you like it, read The Black Swan. They're both listed in the right-hand margin.
Posted by: Russ Roberts | May 1, 2007 12:47:34 PM
More thoughts on this. Mr. Taleb points out the problems associated with building models. What does this mean for all we read about global warming predictions that warn us of doom 100 years out?
Posted by: Speedmaster | May 1, 2007 12:59:03 PM
Having built several (pseudo) predictive statistical models myself, it probably means that these global warmers have misidentified several inputs and/or their relative weightings, interactions, and other anomalies, and have most likely failed to account for numerous other variables and their relative climatological importance.
In short, they’re looking at a very narrow set of conditions/interactions, and fudging the input numbers (especially for CO2). Don’t believe most of what they say.
I haven’t read Taleb’s books, yet. They’re next up.
Posted by: Mesa EconoGuy | May 4, 2007 9:21:13 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.
