« Stealth Site | Main | Vernon (and Fred) Smith» Russell Roberts
May 21, 2007
Dogs Bark
Don Boudreaux
Here's a letter of mine that appears in today's edition of USA Today:
USA TODAY reader Otis Howard complains that "senators who got millions of dollars in contributions from the pharmaceutical companies over the years should be ashamed of themselves" ("Drug bill sham," Letters, Wednesday).
Alas, blaming politicians for taking campaign contributions from parties affected by legislation is akin to blaming polar bears for eating seals. It's in the nature of both beasts to behave in these ways.
Truly shameful people are those who condone open-ended regulation by government. Officials possessing the power to destroy billions of dollars of wealth with the strokes of their pens will inevitably be feted, seduced, bribed and otherwise lobbied by those whose wealth is at stake. Persons who expect otherwise should be ashamed of themselves.
Posted by Don Boudreaux in Politics | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/23120/18647594
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dogs Bark:
Comments
Accurate and simply right.
If government, not consumers, pick winners and losers it is logical that business shall focus its attention on govt. instead of consumers.
How can this simple fact surprise anyone?
Posted by: andy | May 21, 2007 9:23:52 AM
I was just making this argument over the weekend. The simplest way to keep money out of politics is not "campaign finance reform", it's reducing the power of government.
Posted by: madlibs | May 21, 2007 10:50:36 AM
Indeed! The entire issue of lobbying would likely evaporate if our politicians were unable to "sell" government force in the first place. This is essentially what happens when government interfers in the economy by regulation and the making of various "official" choices (generally with the collusion of businesses and industries) thus precluding market outcomes.
Posted by: Al Abbott | May 21, 2007 10:54:08 AM
Though I agree with the other three posters, I would like to remind everyone here that The market never truly leads to an "outcome" as we'll never really reach equilibrium (isn't that a tenet of the Austrian school the market as a process, not an end?)
It seems silly, yet we consistantly see that the perceived sollution to Gov't screw-ups seems to be increased Gov't power (I believe it was Higgs work on the ratchet effect of gov't that helped to show this)
Posted by: Jon | May 21, 2007 2:46:54 PM
Shame, Don.
Shame for pointing the finger right where it belongs. We truly shameful people will never be able to forgive you.
Posted by: True_liberal | May 21, 2007 6:23:56 PM
