« Illegal Immigrants | Main | Young entrepreneurs» Russell Roberts
June 13, 2007
The myth of the rational voter
Russell Roberts
I just interviewed Bryan Caplan on his new book, The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies, for an upcoming EconTalk podcast. The podcast should be released on June 25. I'd encourage you to read his book in advance of the podcast if you have the time. It is fascinating, provocative and very well-written. Bryan argues that the bad policies we get aren't because special interests have hijacked the political process but rather because democracy works too well—it gives irrational voters what they want. The logic is relentless. He will make you think.
Posted by Russell Roberts in Books, Podcast, Politics | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834518ccc69e200e008c4d3d28834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The myth of the rational voter:
Comments
Haven't I heard the phrase "Tyranny of the majority" before?
Posted by: True_liberal | Jun 14, 2007 7:57:15 AM
One of the results of poltical government is interference with feedback feedback mechanisms. By socializing costs, the results of bad policies are difficult to connect to the policy without deeper analysis than a typical voter can devote to the matter. Of course, there is the gesturing and obfuscaton of politicians to further cloud issues.
Posted by: Sam Grove | Jun 15, 2007 11:19:13 AM
...misspelling 'obfuscation' is so awesome. It just adds to the whole point.
Posted by: shawn | Jun 15, 2007 10:02:38 PM
Nice write-up of the book in The Economist this week. Liked their conclusion....good book, but Caplan will never run for office because he'll never be able to get elected.
Posted by: tw | Jun 20, 2007 10:57:15 AM
Sorry to say. Caplan’s book is full of illogical and contradictory arguments, mangled terms, cultural prejudice, and a whole lot of other weaknesses. It’s also pretty scary when you really think about what he is arguing for. Like a lot of cloistered academics, he’s hermetically sealed inside his own thinking and theories, and totally unhinged from the real world... past and present. I won’t recap the whole list of objections here... but it’s on my site. (literalmayhem.com)
Posted by: Martin | Sep 21, 2007 10:33:57 PM
Economists fail to appreciate the symbolic import of democracy and the process of voting.
In the absence of voting, which is what I think Caplan rails against, there would be two options in the maintenance of social coherence: brute force or the assumption of fully unified rationality between all sectors of society.
Markets are no more rational than the individuals comprising them. If we assume that some are smart and know everything, and others are dumb and know nothing, we are not endorsing justice - we are endorsing a tyranny of the minority. This is not a bad thing per se, but it certainly gives rise to oligarchs with nothing but bloody instrumentality on their minds.
Sure, voters are irrational, but for some reason, the system still works coherently.
Posted by: JGS | Aug 15, 2008 5:22:07 AM
Posted by: laptop battery | Oct 13, 2008 3:49:30 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.
